2-17-12 Letter from Commissioner Burke to Senator O’Mara / Assemblyman Palmesano
Last Updated on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 11:08 Written by harris Tuesday, 21 February 2012 07:07
This post is from the letter which Assemblyman Palmesano received the night before he spoke to us. He read the letter, leaving out the names, due to HIPPA requirements. This version also deletes all the rave reviews we heard about how happy the people are who have been moved (as an argument against not bringing them back?) While this letter has less detail, several people recorded the original meeting and we will be checking for what may be missing. Meanwhile, rather than hold it up, here is the promised letter:
Middlesex IRA
OPWDD/Finger Lakes DDSO
Follow up Issues
How did the DDSO communicate the pending changes with the families of those
served?
On or before January 5, 2012 DDSO managers personally called all
families and shared the status of the compromised capacity of our existing
fire suppression system. At that time, families were also notified of the
necessary system renovations and that even with the re-engineering
complete, with the increasing needs for long term fully handicapped
supports not available at this location, an alternate placement for their
loved ones was now necessary. During each conversation, we affirmed our
commitment to pursue the best fit for each person. The initial reaction to
the notification, with the exception of one family, acknowledged the safety
needs of their family member and only asked if they could be moved closer
to home. Most families felt confident that the DDSO had their best
interests in mind and only wanted an update as to when the move happened,
how to contact the new home, and how their loved one was adjusting. Other
families received multiple updates regarding site selection, the
availability of house tours, and our efforts to allay transition concerns.
Families also spoke with their service coordinators, MHLS, Middlesex staff,
as well as Yates ARC staff.
What is the extent of Fire Safety renovations?
On 11/22/11, the Middlesex IRA was identified as a home with a
sprinkler system with inadequate water storage capacity. Following up on
that finding, representatives from the Finger Lakes Developmental
Disabilities Services Office (DDSO) conducted a Fire Safety Evaluation
(FSES is a standardized instrument that rates the fire vulnerability of
physical structures, the higher the score, the safer the location) and an
unannounced fire drill that identified additional structural deficiencies
making it impossible for us to maintain the home’s Life Safety Code
designation of Health Care Occupancy (the highest level of fire
protection). As a result, we immediately increased staffing and
implemented interim plans made to remedy some of the simpler structural
deficiencies identified (paneling replaced with sheet rock, additional
smoke detectors installed). However, those interventions did not address
the reviewers concerns with the structural lay out of the home that went
far behind simple repairs and an upgraded sprinkler system. Specifically,
the home did not have two remote exits, i.e., in the event of a fire and
individuals in wheelchairs have limited options for evacuation. For
example, East wing occupants would have only one means of egress while
staff would have to lift individuals in wheelchairs who occupied the North
wing of the home around the sunken living room to use an alternate exit.
The Life Safety Code has changed several times since 1983 so the original
construction standards are problematic too, i.e., sunken living room and
kitchen’s fire exit stairway.
While we intend to go forward with the sprinkler system upgrade, with
work commencing this spring (this project is being supervised by DASNY,) we
made immediate plans to move the vulnerable population from Middlesex to
other homes in the area.
The physical plant modifications that will be necessary with a new
population will include an egress control system, new fire doors, and
safety alarms costing less than $10,000. Additionally, we will increase
staffing ratios from a 1:4 (staff to people served) to a 1:3 ratio. This
staffing configuration will ensure that the individuals moving into the
home will be afforded full staff supervision 24/7. There is no need to
include any fencing or property access limits – we will not be moving in
anyone with a history of elopement.
Can the home be renovated to accommodate the needs of the Original
Occupants?
The existing home at 6166 South Vine Valley Road is situated on the
eastern edge of a NY State owned 11-acre parcel in the Town of Middlesex.
The Finger Lakes DDSO operates the property as an Individualizes
Residential Alternative (IRA) serving nine developmentally disabled
individuals with limited ambulation and evacuation capacities. Even with
the benefits of our needed fire suppression renovations and upgrades, the
existing footprint of the home no longer meets the increased needs of the
original occupants and presents physical plant limitations that cannot be
effectively mitigated.
For example, due to the steep grade of the land, the fire exit from
the kitchen at the rear of the home consists of a long stairway above a
walkout basement. In order to make that exit handicapped accessible, the
eastern portion of the entire property would have to be re-graded some 12
feet higher around the existing structure. Internally, the home’s sunken
living room would require major floor joist and truss re-engineering to
raise the floor at which point problems would exist with ceiling heights
and further compromise access to that space. Other than demolition and
reconstruction, there are no effective modifications to the existing
structure sufficient to support the designated Health Care Occupancy
rating.
As a result, the DDSO is offering placements for each of the people
we currently serve into settings already fully handicapped accessible, with
comprehensive fire suppressions systems, and the physical plant capacity to
support any additional needs each person may demonstrate as they age.
[...] Commissioner Burke to Assemblyman Palmesano [...]
[...] Commissioner Burke to Assemblyman Palmesano [...]